Novel Product for the Management of Coronary Ruptures Happening during Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Case Rep Cardiol. 2021; 2021: 6688338.
Published online 2021 Feb 11. doi: 10.1155/2021/6688338
PMCID: PMC7892221
PMID: 33628517

Abstract

Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary interventions is a rare but dreaded complication. One of the treatment methods for this complication is the injection of an obliterating material into the ruptured vessel. We will introduce a novel material named “Spongostan” for embolization with significant advantages over available treatment options.

We're putting some ads to pay for site maintenance. Please let us know if you're seeing something innapropriate.

1. Introduction

Coronary perforation is a potentially fatal complication of PCI [1]. It is a rare complication with more prevalence in females and patients with hypertension, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, and those admitted with NSTEMI [2]. It also has a higher incidence during complex procedures like bifurcation stenting, very tortuous or heavily calcified vessels, use of atheroablation devices, or CTO procedures [1, 2]. The most common cause of these perforations is wire tip induced [3]. This complication can be fatal and needs to be addressed properly. With more and more aggressive and advanced techniques or wires like heavy CTO-dedicated wires used, the rate of this complication rises [1–3]. Ellis classification (Table 1) shows the different types of coronary perforations [4].

Table 1

Ellis classification.

Ellis classification Description
Type I Extraluminal crater without extravasation
Type II Epicardial fat or myocardial blush without extravasation
Type III Extravasation through a frank (>1 mm) perforation
Type IIICS Extravasation through a frank (>1 mm) perforation into a circulatory chamber (e.g., left ventricle or coronary sinus)
Open in a separate window

Its incidence is between 0.35 and 0.52 percent [5]. A very high index of suspicion, timely diagnosis, and often definitive treatment are required to minimize adverse outcomes from this complication [5, 6].

2. Case Presentation

A 50-year-old female presented to our hospital with increased intensity of exertional retrosternal chest pain. She had exertional chest pain from a few days before and experienced a more severe form of pain from 3 hours before admission with slight exertion. The pain had a compressive nature without radiation and was accompanied by diaphoresis. On physical examination, she had a blood pressure of 135/85 mmHg, a heart rate of 86 beats/minute, and a respiratory rate of 20/minute. She had no fever. There was no remarkable finding in the physical examination.

2.1. Past Medical History

She had a history of controlled hypertension from 10 years before. She was a smoker for 15 years (7.5 pack-year). No history of cardiac disease or diabetes mellitus was present.

2.2. Differential Diagnosis

Considering her past medical history and sign and symptoms, acute coronary syndrome was the main diagnosis.

2.3. Investigations

Electrocardiography was done for the patient that revealed ST-segment depression in anterior and lateral precordial leads.

On laboratory testing, she had troponin I elevated to fivefolds of the normal upper limit.

Considering the diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation-myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and due to the refractory angina after the event, she underwent diagnostic coronary angiography which revealed two-vessel diseases with significant stenosis in left anterior descending- (LAD-) diagonal bifurcation (Video 1) and proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and a low SYNTAX score (Figure 1).

Please note that this image might contain sensitive content. Click to unblur.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is CRIC2021-6688338.001.jpg
Open in a separate window
Figure 1

(a) Anterior-posterior (AP) cranial projection showing the stenosis in LAD-diagonal bifurcation. (b) Left anterior oblique (LAO) cranial projection showing the stenosis in LAD-diagonal bifurcation. (c) Right anterior oblique projection showing stenosis in RCA.

Therefore, she was planned to undergo stage percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on LAD-diagonal bifurcation and then proximal RCA.

2.4. Management

Our plan for LAD-diagonal bifurcation was to perform provisional stenting and after wiring both branches’ predilation in both vessels and finally, provisional stenting in LAD (Video 2) with postdilation, and final proximal optimization technique (POT) was done (Figure 2(a)). After final POT, the patient developed severe refractory chest pain and ST-segment changes due to closure of the jailed diagonal artery so we decided to perform rewiring (Video 3) and balloon opening of the occluded diagonal (Figure 2(b)). After rewiring and ballooning the diagonal, we noticed an iatrogenic rupture in the diagonal artery caused by the wire tip (Video 4, 5) (Figure 2(c)).

Please note that this image might contain sensitive content. Click to unblur.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is CRIC2021-6688338.002.jpg
Open in a separate window
Figure 2

(a) Stenting in LAD and POT. (b) Rewiring in diagonal after its total occlusion. (c) Diagonal rupture.

We started step-wise actions for treatment and management of this rupture including prolonged balloon inflation (Video 6) and serial echocardiographic evaluations. After three episodes of prolonged balloon inflations using a 2 × 20 mm balloon, it seemed that we managed to seal the perforation and there was no more leakage (Video 7). The echocardiographic evaluation showed mild to moderate pericardial effusion, and we terminated the procedure and sent the patient to the coronary care unit (CCU) and kept her under observation.

Four hours later, she had low blood pressure and paradoxical pulse. On serial echocardiography, there were right atrium and right ventricle collapse in favor of tamponade. We quickly sent the patient to the catheterization laboratory. After drainage of the blood from the pericardium and pigtail insertion (Figure 3(a)), we reevaluated the ruptured vessel with angiography and found out that the leakage was persistent (Video 8). Repeated diagonal wiring and prolonged balloon inflation were done again with no luck (Video 9), and we decided to manage the rupture more aggressively (Figure 3(b)).

Please note that this image might contain sensitive content. Click to unblur.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is CRIC2021-6688338.003.jpg
Open in a separate window
Figure 3

(a) Pigtail insertion. (b) Repeated wiring of the diagonal and prolonged balloon inflation.

Our options at this point were to deploy a stent graft in the main LAD vessel or try to occlude the diagonal using coils or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or standard glue material. All these materials and methods have their costs and pitfalls so we decided to use a novel product for sealing the rupture. This product is called “Spongostan” and is a form of Gel foam commonly used by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeons. It is very easy to use, and its preparation takes under two minutes. First, we dissolved the product with standard contrast, and then, the injection was made through a microcatheter tip (Figure 4).

Please note that this image might contain sensitive content. Click to unblur.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is CRIC2021-6688338.004.jpg
Open in a separate window
Figure 4

(a) Spongostan package. (b) Spongostan sponge. (c) Stirring and soaking one-fifth of the sponge in contrast media. (d) Dissolving the sponge using two syringes. (e) Dissolved Spongostan in the contrast. (f) Injection through microcatheter tip.

After injection (Video 10), complete sealing of the ruptured vessel was achieved (Video 11). The patient was then sent to the CCU.

2.5. Follow-Up

After 24 hours the pigtail was removed, the repeated echocardiography showed no pericardial effusion. Repeated angiography was done the next day which showed complete restoration of flow in the diagonal artery and no leakage (Video 12) (Figure 5). During the following three years after her procedure, she had no angina symptoms and is doing well.

Please note that this image might contain sensitive content. Click to unblur.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is CRIC2021-6688338.005.jpg
Open in a separate window
Figure 5

(a) AP cranial projection showing complete restoration of flow in the ruptured diagonal artery and no residual leakage after 48 hours. (b) LAO caudal projection showing complete restoration of flow in the ruptured diagonal artery and no residual leakage after 48 hours.

3. Discussion

In this case, wire-induced coronary rupture happened during bifurcation stenting in a female patient with history of hypertension admitted for NSTEMI. Due to failed conservative management, the patient was treated with a novel product for sealing and treatment of the rupture. To our knowledge, this is the first case report using this material via intracoronary root for hemostatic purposes.

Our novel product “Spongostan” is an absorbable, sterile, water-insoluble, and malleable hemostatic gelatin sponge, intended for hemostatic use by applying to a bleeding surface.

This product is routinely used by ENT surgeons for hemostatic purposes [7]. It has also been used recently for endovascular hemostasis and controlling bleeding in thyroid surgeries [8, 9].

It has a couple of advantages over standard treatment. It is very inexpensive, very easy to use, needs a very short time to prepare, achieves complete sealing very fast, and most importantly, the flow will be restored after 4-6 hours completely after the ruptured vessel was sealed and will achieve complete sealing simply with increasing the injected material in a stepwise manner.

Although conservative management like wait and watch, prolonged balloon inflations using appropriate sized low-pressure balloon inflation, and reversal of heparin are among first steps, more than often more aggressive treatments like fat embolization, coiling, glue injection, or stent grafts are needed as standard treatment based on the situation and localization of the rupture. Each of these treatments has some disadvantages [6, 10]. Fat embolization is time-consuming to get ready, and coiling or glues are very expensive and are not readily available in many centers and are technically demanding to deploy. Stent grafts are expensive and have a very high rate of restenosis and poor long term results. Most importantly, all these methods will lose the affected artery for good and there will be no more flow in the affected vessel [6, 10].

4. Conclusions

Although coronary rupture can be a fatal complication, step-wise actions can help to overcome it. Having a high index of suspicion, timely diagnosis and management are important for managing such patients. The use of novel products can help us manage these patients with a better outcome.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Video 1: coronary angiography showing significant stenosis in LAD artery and diagonal branch. Video 2: stent placed in LAD and side branch flow compromised. Video 3: rewiring of the diagonal branch. Video 4: when tip of the wire is causing rupture of the diagonal branch. Video 5: leakage in the diagonal branch. Video 6: using balloon inflation to seal the rupture. Video 7: rupture under control after prolonged balloon inflation. Video 8: pigtail insertion after 4 hours due to tamponade and angiography showing diagonal leakage. Video 9: using balloon inflation for sealing the diagonal branch. Video 10: injecting Spongostan using microcatheter. Video 11: sealed diagonal branch. Video 12: coronary angiography after 48 hours showing restored diagonal flow without leakage.

Click here for additional data file.(2.3M, zip)

Authors:

Arash Hashemi, 1 Ashkan Hashemi, 2 Arsis Ahmadieh, 1 Azin Alizadehasl, 3 and Mohammad Mostafa Ansari Ramandi
Please note that this image might contain sensitive content. Click to unblur.
corresponding author 4 , 5

Arash Hashemi

1Erfan General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Find articles by Arash Hashemi

Ashkan Hashemi

2Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA

Find articles by Ashkan Hashemi

Arsis Ahmadieh

1Erfan General Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Find articles by Arsis Ahmadieh

Azin Alizadehasl

3Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Find articles by Azin Alizadehasl

Mohammad Mostafa Ansari Ramandi

4Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

5Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran

Find articles by Mohammad Mostafa Ansari Ramandi
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials: Video 1: coronary angiography showing significant stenosis in LAD artery and diagonal branch. Video 2: stent placed in LAD and side branch flow compromised. Video 3: rewiring of the diagonal branch. Video 4: when tip of the wire is causing rupture of the diagonal branch. Video 5: leakage in the diagonal branch. Video 6: using balloon inflation to seal the rupture. Video 7: rupture under control after prolonged balloon inflation. Video 8: pigtail insertion after 4 hours due to tamponade and angiography showing diagonal leakage. Video 9: using balloon inflation for sealing the diagonal branch. Video 10: injecting Spongostan using microcatheter. Video 11: sealed diagonal branch. Video 12: coronary angiography after 48 hours showing restored diagonal flow without leakage.
6688338.f1.zip (2.3M)
GUID: 933E6E55-D7F5-4FBB-86BD-F3AD006D8397

Data Availability Statement

References

1. Fogarassy G., Apró D., Veress G. Successful sealing of a coronary artery perforation with a mesh-covered stent. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2012;24(4, article E80) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. al-Lamee R., Ielasi A., Latib A., et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011;4(1):87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.026. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Stathopoulos I., Panagopoulos G., Kossidas K., Jimenez M., Garratt K. Guidewire-induced coronary artery perforation and tamponade during PCI: in-hospital outcomes and impact on long-term survival. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2014;26(8):371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Hendry C., Fraser D., Eichhofer J., et al. Coronary perforation in the drug-eluting stent era: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome: the UK experience. EuroIntervention. 2012;8(1):79–86. doi: 10.4244/eijv8i1a13. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Shimony A., Joseph L., Mottillo S., Eisenberg M. J. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2011;27(6):843–850. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.04.014. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Jamali A. H., Lee M. S., Makkar R. R. Coronary perforation after percutaneous coronary intervention successfully treated with local thrombin injection. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2006;18(4):E143–E145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Massey C. J., Singh A. Advances in absorbable biomaterials and nasal packing. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2017;50(3):545–563. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.01.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Libra F., Falsaperla D., Desiderio C. M., Signorelli S. S., Palmucci S., Basile A. Spontaneous bleeding in systemic lupus erythematosus: endovascular treatment of two rare cases. Radiology Case Reports. 2020;15(7):992–998. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.04.010. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Scaroni M., von Holzen U., Nebiker C. A. Effectiveness of hemostatic agents in thyroid surgery for the prevention of postoperative bleeding. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1, article 1753) doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58666-4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Shimony A., Zahger D., van Straten M., et al. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2009;104(12):1674–1677. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.07.048. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Case Reports in Cardiology are provided here courtesy of Hindawi Limited

Content retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7892221/.

This article is intended for educational purposes. All credit to the authors.