Erdheim-Chester Disease With Extensive Pericardial Involvement: A Case Report and Systematic Review

Abstract

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by systemic xanthogranulomatous infiltration. We described the case of a female adult presenting with pericardial effusion. Pericardial infiltration is the most frequent cardiac manifestation of ECD and is the one discussed in this article. We found that the majority of patients with pericardial infiltration needed a cardiovascular procedure.

Introduction

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare multisystem non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by systemic xanthogranulomatous infiltration from histiocytes [1, 2]. This disease was first described by Erdheim and Chester in 1930 [3]. The number of cases reporting this disease is small (less than 600), but it has had dramatically increased in recent years, maybe by the increased diagnostic methods available, which enhances the recognition of the disease [4]. Patients with ECD commonly present in the fifth decade; however, pediatric and geriatric presentations have also been reported. ECD results from xanthogranulomatous infiltration of foamy histiocytes; these cells are positive for CD68, negative for CD1a, and in 80% of the cases negative for S100 [5]. ECD manifests as long bone infiltrations, exophthalmos, diabetes insipidus, xanthelasma, interstitial lung disease, bilateral adrenal infiltration, retroperitoneal fibrosis with perirenal or ureteral infiltration causing hydronephrosis and renal failure, testicular infiltration, and in exceptional involves the hearth and the central nervous system [6].

The diagnosis of ECD is based on radiologic and histologic criteria. Imaging studies are prompted for the bone pain referred by the patients. X-rays show bilateral symmetric metaphyseal osteosclerosis of long bones. These lesions are considered virtually pathognomonic. The 99mTc Bone Scintigraphy shows symmetric and abnormally strong 99mTc labeling of the distal ends of the long bones. Microscopy of the lesions shows typical ECD histiocytes. These histiocytes are non-Langerhans’ foamy histiocytes, which lack Birbeck granules, nested within a polymorphic granuloma, fibrosis or xanthogranulomatous. Pathological confirmation of CD68+, CD1a- histiocytes is both sufficient and mandatory for the diagnosis of ECD [6].

Specific somatic genetic mutations in the BRAF V600 gene have been reported in around 54% of patients suffering of ECD, rendering a therapeutic target for the kinase inhibitor, vemurafenib [7]. This medication is the only active Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatment for ECD and has demonstrated long-term efficacy in patients with this genetic mutation [8]. Other medications, as dabrafenib (a BRAF V600E inhibitor) and trametinib (a mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor), are under study as potential therapeutic options [9].

Case Report

We present the case of a 53-year-old woman with diabetes insipidus that has been treated with desmopressin for about 8 years, migraine with aura, and known ECD confirmed by biopsy, with possible involvement of the great cardiac vessel and infiltrative cardiomyopathy. Over the past several years, she has dealt with a multitude of intermittently exacerbated symptoms, including headaches, fatigue, lethargy, exertional dyspnea, flushing, and peripheral edema, which have been clinically attributed to mast cell activation. She was admitted twice during the previous year with symptoms of fluid retention that resolved with diuresis. She was diagnosed with ECD 2 months before this admission, with biopsy confirmation from the vertebra and the left femur. She was admitted to our institution for further management of a newly identified large pericardial effusion (Fig. 1) and ascites, accurately to assess the extension of the cardiac involvement by this disease. In the interim, she had complained of intermittent midsternal chest discomfort associated with dry cough and palpitations that worsened while lying flat.

 

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is cr-11-118-g001.jpg

Open in a separate window
Figure 1

Large pericardial effusion.

She was found to have an acute right frontal infarct and multifocal stenosis through the vessel imaging modalities. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed infarction in the right frontal and parietal white matter, while the magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) revealed extensive intracranial stenosis in the anterior circulation. The final cerebral angiogram showed a right internal carotid artery occlusion, likely secondary to fibromuscular dysplasia changes (Fig. 2). Cerebrospinal fluid tests were normal, and the neurology service concluded that these changes were consistent with vasculopathy secondary to ECD with BRAF mutation.

 

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is cr-11-118-g002.jpg

Open in a separate window
Figure 2

Right internal carotid artery occlusion.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed a large circumferential pericardial effusion greater than 2 cm with maximum thickness around the inferior and posterior left ventricle wall with the partial systolic collapse of the right atrium. She had an ejection fraction of 69% and large pericardial effusion without tamponade physiology. After the evacuation of the pericardial effusion via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), there was minimal pericardial effusion remaining. The pathology exam from pericardium showed histiocytic infiltration compatible with ECD, positive for the BRAF mutation. From these findings, it was concluded that the patient was suffering from a vasculopathy related to ECD. She received corticosteroids for the treatment of the histiocytosis caused by ECD.

She continued her desmopressin for her diabetes insipidus, and she was started on daily aspirin and prednisone, along with pantoprazole and vitamin D for stomach and bone protection. A limited echocardiogram 8 days after VATS showed significant improvement in pericardial effusion (Fig. 3). She was discharged on colchicine, bumetanide and bactrim for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Before going home, a cardiac MRI was done to record the extension of the disease and help with future monitoring (Fig. 4). It was planned to start vemurafenib due to the discovery of the BRAF mutation.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is cr-11-118-g003.jpg

 

Open in a separate window
Figure 3

Reduction in pericardial effusion compared to Figure 1.

 

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is cr-11-118-g004.jpg

Open in a separate window
Figure 4

Cardiac MRI with very scarce effusion. MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods

The process developed for the literature review included the following steps.

First, the relevant keywords were established. We conducted a broad search using the terms pericardial effusion and ECD.

Second, Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched for published articles through September 2019. The combinations of the terms used were: 1) SCOPUS, TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Erdheim-Chester Disease”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Pericardial Effusion”); 2) PUBMED, “Erdheim-Chester Disease” (Mesh) AND “Pericardial Effusion” (Mesh); 3) EMBASE, TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Erdheim-Chester Disease”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Pericardial Effusion”); and 4) COCHRANE, “Erdheim-Chester Disease” in Title Abstract Keyword AND “Pericardial Effusion” in Title Abstract Keyword (word variations have been searched). A total of 206 articles were found (84 from Scopus, 15 from PubMed, 107 from EMBASE and no articles found in Cochrane).

Third, article abstracts were reviewed for study eligibility, followed by reviews of full papers in cases in which eligibility was not clear from the abstract review alone. Another 18 full-text articles were excluded. Figure 5 shows the flow diagram according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [7].

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc. Object name is cr-11-118-g005.jpg

 

Open in a separate window
Figure 5

Flow diagram according to the PRISMA statement. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Selection of studies

Articles were included if they consisted of presentation of pericardial effusion and ECD. Articles were excluded if they were primarily editorials, and solely described study protocols, letters, abstract of congresses or books. The results were summarized in tables.

Results

Fifty-two articles were included in the analysis. Table 1 shows the main characteristics of them. Most of the studies were case reports, eight were reviews and only three were original articles. Table 2 shows the case reports and case series in which patients with ECD presented with pericardial effusion [10-41]. The average age of the patients with ECD who presented with pericardial effusion was 56.64 ± 10.5. The majority of them were men (54.29%). Table 3 shows the interventions in patients reviewed. Almost 40% of the patients reviewed did not need any cardiologic procedure. A total of 30.3% of the patients received pericardiocentesis. Four received pleuro-pericardial window; three, pericardial window and two, pericardiectomy. The following procedures were performed in only one patient: mediastinoscopy, pericardial drainage, and sternotomy. One patient had pericardiocentesis and later received pericardiectomy, and another had pericardiocentesis done twice and later a pleuro-cardial window.

Table 1

Characteristics of Articles
Characteristic N %
Type of article
  Case report 28 53.85%
  Review 8 15.38%
  Letter 4 7.69%
  Series of cases 4 7.69%
  Original 3 5.77%
  Other small publications 5 9.62%
Year
  2001 1 1.92%
  2003 1 1.92%
  2004 1 1.92%
  2006 2 3.85%
  2007 1 1.92%
  2010 3 5.77%
  2011 3 5.77%
  2012 3 5.77%
  2013 2 3.85%
  2014 5 9.62%
  2015 6 11.54%
  2016 8 15.38%
  2017 6 11.54%
  2018 8 15.38%
  2019 2 3.85%
Open in a separate window

Table 2

Reports That Present Cases of Erdheim-Chester Disease With Pericardial Effusion
Author Y S A First manifestation TSD CV manifestations CP Treatment O TO
Andre [12] 2001 M 57 Exophthalmos UK Pericarditis and cardiac tamponade Mediastinoscopy Prednisone, diuretics ACE UK UK
Curgunlu [13] 2003 M 43 Swelling and pain in his right knee 10 months Moderate pericardial effusion Prednisolone, palliative therapy for pain Stable 6 months
Johnson [14] 2004 M 34 Migraines, headache 3 years Pericardial effusion Pericardial drainage UK UK
Palotas [15] 2006 M 57 Already diagnosed at the presentation UK Pericardial effusion with left ventricle enlarged UK UK
Saboerali [16] 2006 M 45 Chest pain and a nonproductive cough 2.5 years Pericardial thickening and effusions without inflow disruption UK UK UK
Palotas [17] 2007 M 57 Pericardial effusion and exophthalmos UK Pericardial effusion Sternotomy UK UK UK
Alharthi [10] 2010 F 53 Bilateral ankle swelling and shortness of breath 1 year Large pericardial effusion and pan cardiac involvement Pericardiocentesis Cladribine Stable 12 months
Kim [18] 2010 M 68 Multiple yellowish plaques and a pinkish nodule on his face and scalp 1.5 years Moderate pericardial effusion Interferon-α Stable 16 months
Lutz [19] 2011 F 65 Recurrent pericardial effusion 3 months Chronic pericardial effusion, a mass attached to the pericardium, and a thickened aorta Pericardiocentesis Glucocorticoids and interferon-α Dead UK
Vega [20] 2011 M 76 Progressive congestive heart failure 8 months Pericarditis and cardiac tamponade Pleuro-pericardial window Steroids and methotrexate UK UK
Egan [21] 2011 F 53 Progressive dyspnea on exertion and lower extremity edema 1 year Mild chronic fibrosing pericarditis and pericardial effusion Pleuro-pericardial window UK Stable 4 months
Ota [22] 2012 F 77 Dyspnea on exertion 1 year Pericardial effusion Pericardiocentesis Methylprednisolone and then interferon-α UK UK
Takeuchi [23] 2012 M 56 Left exophtalmus UK Pericardial effusion UK UK
Dagna [24] 2012 M 56 Recurrent pericardial effusion, recent cardiac tamponade and signs of heart failure 2 years Recurrent pericardial effusion, recent cardiac tamponade and signs of heart failure Pericardial window Infliximab and methotrexate Stable 30 months
M 60 Already diagnosed UK Pericardial effusion Infliximab and methotrexate Stable 12 months
Dogan [25] 2013 M 62 Recurrent pericardial effusion 5 months Large amount of pericardial effusion, and a mass which surrounds the right atrium Pericardiocentesis + pericardiocentesis + pleuro-pericardial window Methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide Stable UK
Alexiou [26] 2015 F 56 Mesenteric panniculitis 8 years Recurrent pericardial effusion UK Dead
De Miguel [27] 2015 F 61 Symptoms of congestive heart failure 1 week Irregular right atrial mass and moderate to severe pericardial effusion Corticosteroids Stable 12 months
Mishra [28] 2015 M 57 Worsening dyspnea, non-productive cough, reduced appetite and weight loss 6 months Recurrent large pericardial effusion, pericardial thickening and right ventricular collapse Pericardiocentesis Glucocorticoids and interferon-α Dead
Abdellateef [29] 2016 F 19 Unilateral left exophthalmos 6 years Cardiac tamponade Pericardiocentesis Prednisolone and azathioprine Stable 1 month
Azadeh [30] 2016 M 61 Pleural and cardiac effusion 4 months Cardiac muscle hypertrophy, pericardial effusion and adhesions Cladribine Improved 6 months
Mathis [31] 2016 F 59 Chronic headaches and asthenia 5 years Right peri-atrial infiltration, thickening of the wall of the aortic arch and pericardial effusion Interferon-α and clopidogrel Stable 4 years
Nakhleh [32] 2016 M 68 Weight loss and general weakness 6 months Cardiomegaly and small pericardial effusion Pericardiocentesis Interferon-α Dead
Peric [33] 2016 M 23 Severe exophthalmos and vision loss of the left eye 6 months Pericardial thickening with effusion and right atrial collapse Cladribine Improved 12 years
Kyriakopoulou [34] 2016 F 77 Bilateral exophthalmos, orbital xanthogranuloma and fatigue 4 months Acute cardiac tamponade Pericardiocentesis Corticosteroids + subcutaneous interferon-α-2b then changed to peginterferon-α-2a Stable 12 months
Bentel [35] 2017 M 54 Left adrenal mass UK Pericardial effusion Pericardial window No specific treatment Stable 8 years
Chasseur [36] 2017 F 74 Giant xanthelasma and progressive bilateral exophthalmos causing partial loss of vision 3 months Massive cardiac tamponade with right ventricular compression Pericardiocentesis Corticosteroids and then interferon-α Improved 4 months
Franco-Palacios [37] 2017 M 20 Subacute non-productive cough, new onset orthopnea and exertional dyspnea at rest 1 month Pericardial effusion Pericardial window Steroids and interferon-α Improved 13 months
Zhu [38] 2017 F 51 Shortness of breath, chest pain, recurrent edema of legs and night sweats UK Pericardial effusion Pericardiectomy Interferon-α Stable 7 months
Lierscha[39] 2017 F 75 Ulcerating sub mammary plaques, yellowish rash on central trunk and keratotic plaques on her lower legs 13 years Small pericardial effusions Interferon-α and local PUVA then methotrexate Stable 12 months
Monmany [40] 2018 F 69 Exophthalmos and facial pain 6 months Heterogeneous mass and pericardial effusion Pericardiocentesis + pericardiectomy Pegylated interferon-α-2a Improved 3 months
Tomelleri [41] 2018 M 62 Recurrent pericardial effusions 1 year Recurrent pericardial effusions Pleuro-pericardial window Anakinra Improved 2 months
Costaa[11] 2018 F 64 Already diagnosed at the presentation UK Atrial pseudotumor, pericardial thickening and effusion UK UK
Open in a separate window

Y: year; S: sex; A: age; TSD: time from start of symptoms to diagnosis; TO: time to outcome; CV: cardiovascular; UK: unknown; CP: cardiovascular procedure; ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; PUVA: photochemotherapy. aOnly one of the cases presented with pleural effusion.

Table 3

Interventions Performed in the Cases of Erdheim-Chester Disease With Pericardial Effusion
Procedure N %
None 13 39.39%
Pericardiocentesis 8 24.24%
Pericardial window 3 9.09%
Pleuro-pericardial window 3 9.09%
Mediastinoscopy 1 3.03%
Pericardectomy 1 3.03%
Pericardial drainage 1 3.03%
Sternotomy 1 3.03%
Pericardiocentesis + pericardectomy 1 3.03%
Pericardiocentesis + pericardiocentesis + pleuro-pericardial window 1 3.03%

 

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/

Open in a separate window
Auto closing in 2 seconds